Rambling thoughts about the news
Jul. 21st, 2006 06:24 pmThe Independent has a way with striking front pages, but today’s was exceptional. Under the headline Middle East: Who backs immediate ceasefire? were two boxes. One,
It is enough to make you weep with rage.
Yesterday I was talking to a friend with whom I do not always agree on political matters. He thinks, for example, that the US Supreme Court’s decision regarding Guantanamo Bay was the wrong decision. He has consistently tended to be more critical of the Palestinians than the Israelis. Even he, though, thinks the behaviour of Israel at the moment is egregious.
Why can’t our government see that? Why does our government think that now, the time when Israel is bombing a country with nothing like the ability to stand up to them, is not an appropriate time to criticise them?
There is, apparently, an anti-war march tomorrow in London, Glasgow and Edinburgh. I gather
fjm is planning to go on the London one, and I can certainly understand the impulse...
But what is the point? We have seen enormous numbers on the street protesting against the Iraq invasion, both before and after the assault on Iraq started. It made no difference whatever. Short of Knacker of the Yard arresting him for corruption regarding the honours system, he is secure in power until he chooses to go. While he is secure, he shows no inclination to listen to anyone he does not want to listen to. As the marchers are not rich Americans, media tycoons, etc., why should he pay attention to them? The news reports will underestimate the turnout, if they report it much at all. The only good thing is that people can say:
On a different matter: Wyatt Twerp was given a specially made cowboy outfit?
What?
Oh, for satire to be back... or at least Spitting Image.
There is a headline of a story in today’s Independent which caught my eye:
It seems to me the answer is bloody obvious: the junking of the grant system. The words
Well, if I were at school now, I probably would not be going to university. Educationally, I am a product of a comprehensive school (a good one) and a university which I got to by means of the student grant. Without it, my parents could not have afforded to send me to university (although they might have tried to find the money, I have no doubt). When I was at school, we knew that if we had the intellectual ability, we could get to university. We did not have to think about accrueing thousands of pounds of debt in order to do it.
That was all a bit ranty, sorry.
Yes, contains the flags of 189 countries. The other,
No, has only three flags surrounded by white space: Israel, USA, and... us.
It is enough to make you weep with rage.
Yesterday I was talking to a friend with whom I do not always agree on political matters. He thinks, for example, that the US Supreme Court’s decision regarding Guantanamo Bay was the wrong decision. He has consistently tended to be more critical of the Palestinians than the Israelis. Even he, though, thinks the behaviour of Israel at the moment is egregious.
Why can’t our government see that? Why does our government think that now, the time when Israel is bombing a country with nothing like the ability to stand up to them, is not an appropriate time to criticise them?
There is, apparently, an anti-war march tomorrow in London, Glasgow and Edinburgh. I gather
But what is the point? We have seen enormous numbers on the street protesting against the Iraq invasion, both before and after the assault on Iraq started. It made no difference whatever. Short of Knacker of the Yard arresting him for corruption regarding the honours system, he is secure in power until he chooses to go. While he is secure, he shows no inclination to listen to anyone he does not want to listen to. As the marchers are not rich Americans, media tycoons, etc., why should he pay attention to them? The news reports will underestimate the turnout, if they report it much at all. The only good thing is that people can say:
We were not for this.Perhaps that is enough. But aside from that the futility of it all is depressing.
On a different matter: Wyatt Twerp was given a specially made cowboy outfit?
What?
Oh, for satire to be back... or at least Spitting Image.
There is a headline of a story in today’s Independent which caught my eye:
Why are fewer students from poor backgrounds going to university?
It seems to me the answer is bloody obvious: the junking of the grant system. The words
grantand
grantsare nowhere to be found in the piece.
Well, if I were at school now, I probably would not be going to university. Educationally, I am a product of a comprehensive school (a good one) and a university which I got to by means of the student grant. Without it, my parents could not have afforded to send me to university (although they might have tried to find the money, I have no doubt). When I was at school, we knew that if we had the intellectual ability, we could get to university. We did not have to think about accrueing thousands of pounds of debt in order to do it.
That was all a bit ranty, sorry.